I was wading through comments on poorly edited, badly structured, opinion piece in the online New York Times and I found this familiar line of baloney in a comment.
“Me”, below, claims: “whites do NOT commit the majority of car jackings, robberies, muggings, murders”.
So I ran a quick look at real data from the FBI. No surprise, 2 of these 4 claims are hard to credit, the statement about robbery appears to be true, and, for murders, no group commits the majority. Blacks are the majority of murder victims. All in 2015. I’m going to check some other years learn more, and will post more here.
There are no discrete “car jacking” or “mugging” statistics, but Assault, Motor Vehicle Theft and Kidnapping would seem a fair approximation. The vast majority of all three are committed by whites.
Here’s my comment in context: Response to racist baloney . Or you can read it here:
The majority of murder VICTIMS are black. and a plurality of killers. I expect whites are the majority of killers of other whites.
of whites: 2101; of blacks: 2254; of other/unknown: 152
by whites: 2104; by blacks: 2507; by other/unknown (rounded) 603
Whites are NOT the majority of robbers, and blacks are:
of whites: 45,812; of blacks: 26,861; of other/unk (rnd): 5000
by whites: 26,369 of blacks 64,636; by other/unknown (rounded) 9,850
Assaults: Majority white and white
against whites: 799,095, against blacks, 352,449, against other/unk (rnd): 58,000
by white: 678,428 by blacks 413,872; by other/unknown (rounded) 81,000
Motor vehicle theft: Majority white and white
against whites: 118,314; against blacks 35,644, other/unk: (rnd) 14,000
by whites: 45,791 by blacks 21,544; by other/unknown (rounded) 37,000
Kidnapping/abduction: Majority white and white
of whites, 11,883, of blacks 4,175; by other/unk (rounded) 850
by white: 10,188 by blacks 6,299; by other/unknown 1,175
“Me” also claims “Mass shootings are extremely rare” – depends on how you define “mass shooting” and “rare”. We have a LOT of shootings and multiple victims are often hit.”
For thoughts on the original piece, “White Nationalism Is Destroying the West”, in general, see: Somebody has to say these things… or read it here:
“There are steps, small or large, still steps, between anti-immigrant positions, anti-Muslim positions and white nationalism. What, then, is the point of this poorly edited opinion piece? That anti-immigrant movements are a fertile recruiting ground for white nationalists? True, and hardly worth this much close reasoning. That Muslims are the stated, rejected, “Other”, but that white nationalism threatens Western liberalism in general? We’re past that point when discussing anti-Semitic advertising in Hungary. Asserted and accepted. Please go on.
The last three paragraphs probably should be the first three, and then some support for the assertions in those paragraphs mustered as the body of the piece. As it stands ‘Western” variously means Europe, or Europe and America, and that is probably Europe and the United States of America. Canada dismissed as just more Europeans and Mexico omitted entirely.
Or, is “West” shorthand for “Western Democracy”? What about all the other democracies in the world that aren’t in Europe or even North America? Brazil? South Africa? Japan? South Korea? ( added after submitting to NYT: India? Pakistan? Australia? New Zealand? Argentina? Ghana? etc. etc. etc. )
Since the writer takes their definition of “West” and “White Nationalism” seriously, perhaps they could state and defend their definition, on the way to broader points. Supporting “White nationalism is in many ways a mirror image of radical Islamism.” would be a good start.”