bill abbott’s weblog

Entries categorized as ‘Uncategorized’

“normalish” lenses for the Nikon D-40…

December 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Replacements for my 18-55mm Nikkor lens, that I think I broke by knocking the camera off a table. The camera’s a D-40, with no focusing motor in the camera body. So Auto Focus only works with lenses that have a motor built into them, true for many but not all Nikkors.

This is the one I broke…
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II – Amazon $119

Pricing as of 12/26/09
Prime Lenses

AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G – Amazon/17th St. Photo $200 list
AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G – Amazon $582 list / $440 Amazon
AF-S VR NIKKOR 200mm f/2G IF-ED – Amazon $5450 list / $5000 Amazon

Zoom Lenses

Sort by minimum length
AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED – B&H Photo $800
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED – Adorama $1000
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $2,185.00 list / $1,818.98 Amazon
AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Adorama $629.95
AF-S -NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED – Amazon List $2,135.00 / $1,764.95
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED – A B&H Photo $1370
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR – B&H Photo $179
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED – Amazon $390 B&H Photo $390 / Adorama say its discontinued!
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Amazon $360 / B&H Photo $320 / Adorama $320 ($400 list)
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II – Amazon $750 / Adorama $780 / list $850
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $1800 / Adorama $1770
AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED – Amazon $540 / Adorama $570


sort by price

AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR – B&H Photo $179
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Amazon $360 / B&H Photo $320 / Adorama $320 ($400 list)
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED – Amazon $390 B&H Photo $390 / Adorama say its discontinued!
AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED – Amazon $540 / Adorama $570
AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Adorama $629.95
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II – Amazon $750 / Adorama $780 / list $850
AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED – B&H Photo $800
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED – Adorama $1000
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED – A B&H Photo $1370
AF-S -NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED – Amazon List $2,135.00 / $1,764.95
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $1800 / Adorama $1770
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $2,185.00 list / $1,818.98 Amazon

sort by range of length
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $2,185.00 list / $1,818.98 Amazon
AF-S -NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED – Amazon List $2,135.00 / $1,764.95
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED – Adorama $1000
AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED – B&H Photo $800
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $1800 / Adorama $1770
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR – B&H Photo $179
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED – A B&H Photo $1370
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED – Amazon $390 B&H Photo $390 / Adorama say its discontinued!
AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED – Amazon $540 / Adorama $570
AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Adorama $629.95
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Amazon $360 / B&H Photo $320 / Adorama $320 ($400 list)
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II – Amazon $750 / Adorama $780 / list $850

sort by rminium (average) apeture
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $1800 / Adorama $1770
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED – Amazon $2,185.00 list / $1,818.98 Amazon
AF-S -NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED – Amazon List $2,135.00 / $1,764.95
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED – A B&H Photo $1370
AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED – Adorama $1000
AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED – B&H Photo $800AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED – Amazon $390 B&H Photo $390 / Adorama say its discontinued!
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR – B&H Photo $179
AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED – Amazon $540 / Adorama $570
AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Adorama $629.95
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR – Amazon $360 / B&H Photo $320 / Adorama $320 ($400 list)
AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II – Amazon $750 / Adorama $780 / list $850

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Planning to finish The Wisdom of Bones.

May 20, 2009 · Leave a Comment

We are going to finish Alan Walker and and Pat Shipmans “The Wisdom of Bones”, a truely wonderful book about Homo Erectus and its place as the “missing link” between ourselves and more apelike ancestors. Walker, with Kamoya Kimou and Richard Leakey, excavated and re-assembled the best H. erectus remains found to date, the “Narioktome Boy” #15000, aka 15K, an adolescent about 1.5 million (!) years old.

With this high quality source material, Walker goes through what can be surmised and concluded, bringing in experts from a variety of fields. Its real science, these are the stories underneath the peer-reviewed papers published since the discovery in the 1980s. Walker builds up to a somewhat startling conclusion, Homo erectus, most likely our direct ancestor, wasn’t fully linguate, leaving no concrete evidence of symbolic thought, and lacking a spinal cord sized for fine control of breath and vocal cords.

Rather than the near human in an ape’s body that is often presumed, Walker concludes that H. erectus ws a near-ape in a human’s body. As big or bigger than ourselves, as strong or stronger, wonderfully adapted to standing and running, a very successful tool maker and hunter. An adolescent with a toddler’s brain.

Makes sense, and Pat Shipman is a glorious writer and anatomist in her own right. They are married. The words are hers, the voice is his. So good books, bad cartoons and not a lot else are our story, while we’re all having and recovering from the flu.

Categories: Uncategorized

Walk around Lake Chabot

April 14, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Looks great, and the access point is clearly indicated. I’ve gotta do this one of these daysPreview

http://www.mapmywalk.com/walk/united-states/ca/oakland/460067151

Before that, however, I have to get our taxes done!

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Lights out for an hour… Earthhour observed.

March 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment

So I turned off the lights the hour from 8:30 to 9:30 tonight.  Couldn’t hurt, might help. We had too many lights on anyway. One of the things daddys do, is go around turning out lights, and replacing incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent or other energy savers. Regardless of politics.

We were watching “The Kid’s Choice Awards”, Ben and I were fooling with computers, but no dedicated lamps were on. Seems fair to me.

I find myself saddened any time the PG&E bill indicates we’re using more electricity or natural gas than last year- I figure, another year older, another  recognizable increase in thrift.  Problem is, I switched every lamp to CFLs some time ago, unless they were on a dimmer. So there are 5 incandescent lamps left in the house. And I removed the dimmer from the ceiling lamp in the office- 2 more CFLs there.

Good night,

Bill

Categories: Uncategorized

Recommended Reading

December 4, 2008 · 2 Comments

We are a household of readers and we read a lot of books. Here are some particular favorites, past and present. Our son is now 12…

Perhaps these are aimed too young, but they’re delightful reads…

Winnie The Pooh
The House At Pooh Corner

When We Were Very Young
Now We Are Six
Old Possums Practical Cats
Paddington
The Marvelous Inventions of Alvin Fernald
Alvins’ Secret Code
Emil and the Detectives
Rabbit Hill, The Long Winter
- Robert Lawson
Stuart Little, Charlotte’s Web, The Trumpet of the Swan.

Age Appropriate & enjoyed by all of us:
Bone” graphic novel(s) Really, really, great art, characters, story, plot, you name it. Beautiful.

All Creatures Great and Small, etc, etc. “James Herriot”.
Really good story telling, and yes, though based on real people, this is fiction. Some drinking, smoking, a fair number of complicated deliveries for sheep and some other farm animals.
Based on the writer’s experience but a work of fiction. In the real world, “Helen” wasn’t the woman he married, for starters… All Creatures and the second book were re-read requests, I think we read the pair more than 3 times all the way through…

My Family and Other Animals, Birds, Beasts and Relatives – Gerald Durrell.

British expatriots in Corfu during the 1930s. No clue where theirmoney comes from or what happened tothe father- Gerald (Gerry) is a pre-teen and already a naturalist in training and the youngest of the 4 children. Oldest brother Lawrence is already becoming A Famous Writer, middle sister and brother are teenagers, nowhere near as interesting as the animals Gerrald collects or the locals he meets. “My Family and Other Animals” is my favorite, and we re-read it at least 2-3 times.

A Zoo In My Luggage – Gerald Durrell.

Durrell’s other books are accounts of his collecting expeditions to find animals for other people’s and finally his own zoo. He has great stories, and started the first zoo-as-refuge-for-endangered-species around 1960, on one of the
Channel Islands.

The Cockcoo’s Egg - Cliff Stoll.

True story of a Berkeley grad student who discovers someone breaking into the computers he’s supervising, ends up discovering a German who is hacking university and government computers for the KGB. Includes a goode chocolate chip cookie recipe

The Periodic Table – Primo Levi -

Levi trained as a chemist, growing up in Italy in the 1930s.When the war starts he ends up in the Reisistance, is captured and shipped off to Auchwitz. He survives (working in the I. G. Farbin facility) and returns to Italy after the war. He becomes a paint and varnish chemist. Each story/chapter uses an element as the anchor for an episode, telling his life story from youth to age. Two stories are fictional the one about lead and the one about carbon. He wrote them in a feverish burst along with his acclaimed “Survival In Auchwitz” in 1946. Its wonderful in translation, it must be even more fun in the original Italian.

The Survival of the Bark Canoe – John McPhee.

Profile of Henri Vallencourt, a young man who mastered Native American canoe building technology and built them to order in the 1970s. No pencils, no saws, just a hatchet and a “crooked knife”, bought from the Hudson’s Bay Company. They’re easier to use and maintain than the sharpend beaver tooth they replaced, which is why HBC still sells them. Second half of the book is a canoe trip consisting of McPhee, the canoe maker, and some friends, through the Maine woods that Henry Thourou traveled and wrote about 150 years ago. One half-page reference to Deliverance and jokes about banjo-playing rapists mean it can’t be “G” but “PG” is very fair.

The Hobbit/The Lord of the Rings trilogy. You know these.

The Harry Potter books. You know these too.

The Complete Sherlock Holmes – Sir Aurthur Conan Doyle

All 1100 pages. out loud, twice. If you haven’t had the pleasure, I recomend it. Smoking, light drinking, cocaine use by Holmes when he’s bored. (Watson portrays this unsympatheticly…)

The Fallen Man – Tony Hillerman.

Set on the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico, Hillerman’s mysteries are solved by members of the Navajo Tribal Police. They’re deeply rooted in place and time, and the Navajo and dominant cultures. In this story, a skeleton discovered over 1000 feet up a pinacle which is both popular with climbers and a Navajo sacred place. It may be a rancher who disappeared on his honeymoon years before…

The Maltese Falcon – Dashiel Hammett.

A woman with a complex story visits the small detective agency of Sam Spade and Miles Archer. Archer agrees to watch over her case personally. He is found, shot dead, in the middle of that night, and Sam Spade has to figure out who killed him, and why, and do something about it. One character in a criminal association is gay, and Spade refers to him as a “fairy” in one scene. There are suggestions that another male member of the gang may be his lover, which are not treated as positive. Relatioinships outside of marriage, past and present are key parts of the plot. Archer’s is not the only death. None the less, this is Hammett’s finest and a terrific book about being an adult.

Animal, Vegitable, Miracle – Barbara Kingsolver.

A year of eating locally, and in low-impact, means raising their own food animals and growing crops, as well as preserving by canning and freezing, and seeking meals away from home which are also of locally produced food. Naturally, seasonal foods become staples, and much thought is given to what comes from far away and how commercial, agribusiness farming works, as opposed to small, organic,efforts. Many recipes, the majority of the text is by Kingsolver but her husband and one daughter contribute as well. A really delightful book. A more positive take on the same subject as “The Omnivore’s Dilemma

Hoot, Flush,

These are really terrific kids books- kid centered points of view, serious conflict without it becoming overwhelming, justice triumphs more or less. Unsympathetic characters get a comeuppance and wits and dairing are shown to match brute force and come out ahead. Very likable protagonists, not the same in each book. I was sorry when each ended. Also see “Scat“, about Florida panthers.

Fate Is The Hunter – Ernest K. Gann

Memior of an airline pilot, from the wild days of the 1920s through the Depression, the war and the post-war boom. Superb, humble and honest adventure stories where nobody succeeds without help and kindness from others. Much dry wit, and a steady roll of the names of friends, co-workers and legends who died when fate finally had their number. I read this in 6th grade and loved it. We read it with Benjamin a couple of years ago and he loved it too. Superb writing. When he tired of the airline business, Gann went to medical school and became a doctor- quite a guy.

The Silent World – Jacques Y. Cousteau

From the invention of the Aqualung, in occupied France, through setting up Calypso for expeditions and setting out to make a life with science and diving. Cousteau wrote all his books in English directly, for the world market I suppose.

The Living Sea, World Without Sun, Jacques Y. Cousteau

Further adventures, exploration and science in the 1950s and early 1960s. I remember reading about most of this in The National Geographic some in the latest issues, some in back issues…

Incredible Victory – Walter Lord

The battle of Midway, as told by hundreds of survivors to Mr. Lord, 20 years later. He manages to tell the central parts of the story using quotes from people who were there, on both sides, the very best kind of history. In mid-1942 the Japanese Navy sets out to destroy the remaining US Pacific fleet. By capturing Midway, only 1200 miles from Oahu, they expect to provoke the US fleet into a final battle and defeat them. They don’t know the US Navy is reading their radio codes. In a single day, and amid enormous cost in American lives from Midway and afloat, dive bombers from two US carriers sink all 4 Japanese carriers, though the Japanese manage to sink one American carrier and an accompanying destroyer. This is the beginning of the why Admiral Nimitz got a freeway named after him… This and “A Night To Remember” are Lord’s most famous books, It helps that the good guys win, but the waste and savagery of war are not glossed over.

A Brief History of Time – Stephen Hawking

This is such a great book- it starts with a good cosmological joke, and contains only one equation. Its both a story of what is and how we know it, and what we don’t know yet. We saw Hawking on his last visit to the Bay Area and he’s inspiring. Robert Heinlein once wrote that any scientist who can’t explain what they’re doing, to a child, in 10 minutes, is a fraud. Hawking is not a fraud.

Benjamin read a number of Charlie Bone books to himself, and we read one as bedtime reading. Not my first choice, but he liked them a lot. He’s also current in the Maximum Ride and Levin Thumps series’, and looking forward to the next one in each case.

More fiction:

Holes
Around the World In 80 Days, Jules Verne
A Wrinkle In Time – L’Engle (?)
Jonathan Livingston Seagull – Bach
Summerland
Owls In The Family
– F. Mowat

More natural history:

A Fish Caught In Time -
Waiting For Aphrodite – Sue Hubbell
The Ancient Engineers
– L. Sprague de Camp
Wonderful Life - Stephen J Gould
Life (the first 4 billion years) – Richard Fortey
Trilobite Eyewitness to Evolution – Richard Fortey
The Decypherment of Linear “B” -
The Periodic Kingdom -
Giant Squid – Ellis
Platypus

The Wisdom of Bones – Walker & Shipman – Benjamin loved this and after this we read The Hominid Gang, by Delta Willis, which he liked even more. Willis has a different view of some of the same people and places that are the foundation for Walker and Shipman’s book. Willis was writing while the Nariokatome aka Turkana Boy, the oldest and so-far best preserved Homo Erectus, was being un-earthed and pieced together.

Books we read pieces of but stopped before the end or didn’t want to read all the way through start to finish:

Little Women - Louisa May Allcott – stopped before Amy died.

Read some, then stopped:
Little House In The Woods
Little House On the Praire
Anne of Green Gables
The Yearling

Read here and there, but not the whole thing. Enjoyed in small pieces. Favorites of mine :^)
Rising from the Plain – John McPhee
Assembling California – John McPhee
Looking for a Ship – John McPhee
Taking Wing – Pat Shipman and
Synapsida – McLaughlin
The Man Who Walked Through Time – Colin Fletcher
Carrying The Fire – Michael Collins

In theory good ideas but not yet actually read by/to Benjamin, yet:

Broadsides From The Other Orders – Sue Hubbell
A Country Year – Sue Hubbell
Life on the Missippi,
Mark Twain

A Distant Mirror – Werthimer
Tom Sawyer – Mark Twain
Huckleberry Finn
– Mark Twain
Endurance – Lansing (a powerfully written account of Shackleton’s last Antarctic expedition.)
House of Seven Gables -
The Red Badge Of Courage – S. Crane

I, Juan De. Pareja -

Historical fiction, story of a Moor who is enslaved and owned by the painter Velasquez… De Pareja eventually becomes a paint himself and provokes controversy by painting a black Jesus and Mary Mother and Child picture.

Pride and Prejudice – J. Austin
Sense and Sensability – J. Austin
Emma – J. Austin
Persuasion – J. Austin
Northanger Abbey – J. Austin
Is Paris Burning? -
Beyond the 100th Meridian – W. Stiegner
Wuthering Hieghts -
Last and First Men, Starmaker – Olaf Stapleton
A House In Space – Henry F. S. Cooper
(More) Tony Hillerman…
Diary of a Young Girl – Ann Frank

Categories: 14272739 · Fiction · Me · Non-Fiction · Popular Culture · What · When · Why
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

He made me proud to know him

October 20, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I used to send out what I called “Baby Reports” but that no longer serves the bill- he’s 11 for starters. None the less, I need to say something to someone about yesterday afternoon, because it made me so proud and happy with, of and for our son, Benjamin.

He spent the weekend home sick with a cold, major bummer, and so we were playing board games in the later afternoon on Sunday. I arrived during a spirited game of Aggrivation with Jean, then the three of us played the triangle-piece version of Blockus- YIKES, that’s a tough one! Even more fun than the square-piece original, a really terrific game in my opinion. Lets just say Benjamin won both games. Jean took a break to read, and Benjamin asked for a game of Go.

I had shown Benjamin the rudiments of Go, a favorite of mine and something I do better at than chess, some years ago. I went to Go in part because he could play me to a stalemate in chess, and I was neglecting my fatherly duty by not learning more Chess so I could teach him to beat me outright… or vice versa. :^) Anyway, he knew how to place the stones and make eyes and how to begin and end a game, so I was delighted when he wanted to play… but I had no idea how delighted I’d be!

So we start, he takes black (plays first) and a handycap of 1 stone, and as we play he very carefully constructs a “two eye” structure, something immune from attack. The two, separate, open spaces mean the block can always ‘breathe’, even if it was surrounded on all sides AND I’d put one of my stones into one of the openings… So I’m sketching out one whole side of the board and he’s carefully building something I can’t capture, and then makes a nice wall from that out to both sides so he’s got both of his corners and the side closest to him. His play is quite deliberate and, while not what I would have done, is effective and reasonable. And we’re having this great conversation about the game and how it plays and the costs and benefits of various moves. Suddenly I notice he’s holding the stones at the tip of is first and middle finger- the ‘real’ way you’re supposed to do it. Something I don’t do that much with the tiny stones in the small set I have.

So I ask, has he been playing at school? No, he’d read a Manga (Japanese-style comic book/graphic book) *ABOUT* Go, and it connected with what he already knew. He was making a great show of being a gentleman, and when we discussed his capturing a group of my stones, if I was so incautious as to put them at risk, he said, “Your stones will be well treated, but will likely count against you at the end of game”, or words to that effect- very elaborately polite. And some distance from, “I’m going to crush you!”, (or words to that effect) that he sometimes observes in playing other games.

So we finish the game and count up and although I’ve won, he congradulates me and tells me what an honor it is for him to play someone of my skill…

I have to tell you, I couldn’t be prouder of him- here’s this boy that I love, who’s gone off and read up on something and has brought that back to try out on his dad….It hardly gets better than that! Benjamin is so polite, so well versed in the essentials of what we’re doing, and genuinely enjoying his skill. He’s learned stuff I haven’t taught him, and though I have an edge, he’ll figure out how and why and give me a run for my money soon.

And soon comes next- he asks for another game, and given the mismatch of our previous scores: 41-101 I believe, I offer a handycap of 6 stones, which he takes. Another delightful game insues, in which he applies some of the sketching-out style of play that is typical of the early phase of a go game, rather than going straight to methodical building of solid structures. He’s visibly learning.

The point of the handycap is to allow the game to be competitive- either player should be able to win, and so it proves- I won again, but the score was 40-49 and we can either give him another stone, and he’ll likely beat me, or he can flourish at 6 and beat me eventually. His call.

This was so completely delightful that we went up and interupted Jean’s reading so he could tell her what we’d done. I was so proud of him!

Many happy returns of this day, Benjamin, and without cold symptoms too!

Bill

Categories: Uncategorized

A quick summary of problems I know of with Monogram’s 1/48 de Havilland Mosquito kit.

October 18, 2008 · Leave a Comment

1) Fuselage too narrow, by about an eigth of an inch (3mm) or more! Check your references. I’ll discuss options for fixing this at some later time, its a messy situation, affecting the two fuselage halves, the cockpit canopy and the nose transparency, AND the wings. Unmodified, I believe the wing span is correct, so any increase in fuselage width has to either move the wing root IN an equal amount or commits you to removing that much from the wingtip….

2) Fuselage too ’square’. In some ways, this is the worse problem. Out of the box, the clear nose appears to be an oval in section, vertically: 0, rather than the circle O it should be. Widening the fuselage, as I did, in part, with strip stock at the seam between the halves results in an opening for the clear nose part which is square with rounded corners! Yikes! All I plan to do to fix the one I’m ‘improving’ is to insert stock to widen the clear nose piece, sand smooth and shiny and use that as a pattern for a new clear piece…. or maybe saw it in half, remove the optical flat for the bombardeer, widen it, and paint the spacer as the ‘window frame, then add the right shape optical flat piece….

3) Fin and rudder are too tall by about 1/4 inch, a scale foot. The Modeler’s Datafile or Aero Detail book has a drawing of the kit fin and rudder and the correct shape superimposed- you don’t have to cut it off and remove a section, then re-attach, as I’ve started to do. Apparently, it can be nibbled/sanded down to the correct shape

4) Horizontal Stabalizers/Elevators too narrrow. Also by about 1/4 inch each. I plan to cut each half into two pieces but not at the same place, then glue them together like: ======_===–======( – a gap on each side, which I’ll fill with sheet or strip styrene stock. The horizontal surfaces are split into two, solid, pieces, so this ought to be very strong.

5) I’ve *READ* that the narrow fuselage partially disguises the nacelles being too close to the fuselage- resulting in the props being too small lin diameter too. What a naaaaasty problem if true! I need to check this, although I don’t plan, today, to fix it.

6) And then there are the nits

6.1) The two seats are identical, and not correct. Pilot’s seat is asymetric with asymetrical back, bucket seat that holds the pilot’s parachute pack which serves as a cushion. The Observer should have a cushion fixed on the bomb-bay roof and a back rest anchored on the wing spar/builkhead ,,, Or a later observer’s seat should include the two-piece armor with a porthole in it. Being two pieces allowes the top to be folded down for access to the radios.

6.2) The radio shelf, above the front spar of the wing, should have two boxes, one with 6 colorful knobs around the corners of one and a big vernier dial n the face of the other. Another pair of boxed mechanisms should be mounted behind the piloit’s seat, and a Radio control box needs to be mounted BELOW the throttle.

6.3) The throttle, Very pistol and its many cartridges, along with thermos bottle(s), dry air filters, oxygen economisers, crash axe, fire extinguishers, cold air vents, the Observer’s side Junction Boxes with meters and pushbuttons, etc, etc, all kinds of kit and kaboodle clamped or clipped to the walls, are all MISSING. Never mind the emergency hydraulic pump and its handle, the sanitary tank, medical kit, chart table (a whole TABLE) etc, etc.In short, all the texture on the walls. The instrument panel is pretty good, everything else is missing.

6.4) Cables, pipes, control rods, crank mechanisms, etc, etc, are all absent. A bundle of cables comes away from the draught proof bulkhead on both sides and runs to the side panels for Observer and Pilot, as well as the radio gear in the cockpit, the controls and indicators, etc. A huge blob of cables crosses over from the Observer’s side to the back of the instrument panel, on the roof of the sighting station in the nose.\

6.5 The floor level is too high, the step at the edge of the Bomb Bay is too small, the step at the wing forward spar is too high…. none of that stuff is right! And NONE of the stuff in the bombardeer’s compartment in the nose is the right shape, size, idea, etc. For starters, the floor should just meet the lower edge of the nose transparency… \

6.6 Main landing gear legs stop at the edge of the nacelles- forward struts should go up the firewall, aft bracing struts should meet aft wing spar. The main gear well should be boxed in fore and aft, with exposed aluminum structure on the sides… and a mud-guard should be above the spot the tail-wheel retracts into.

6.7 Main landing gear leg rubber compresison blockg shock obsorbers are entirely missing. Along with an apparently “Metal” fuselage, Monogram’s Mosquito has a regular oleo-pneumatic main gear suspension instead of the rubber block business designed by de Havilland.

6.8 Cockpit door on bottom of fuselage is the wrong shape, too long fore and aft, and has no drift sight window.

6.9 Trailing wire antennae is mounted on the underside center of the fuselage- should be at one side, directly below the crank/spool and tube on the wall outboard of the Observer.

Wow that’s a lot. But ya know, it builds into soomething that looks JUST LIKE a Mosquito. Sure, I could do one with chipped paint showing bare aluminum on the fuselage, and mirror finished pneumatic struts at the bottom of the gear, with anti-shimmy arms… but only Real Nerds would get it. So I’m taking a break from fixing one of these kits and building another one sraight out of the box, no changes to the parts, just correct assembly. Nothing added or subtracted. I’ve painted all the cockpit detail- it looks great!

Bill

Categories: Me · Model Airplanes · Plastic Models · Uncategorized
Tagged:

Tamiya Color For Westland Whirlwind (Fighter)

October 2, 2008 · 2 Comments

One of the questions that brought someone to this weblog yesterday was about Tamiya colors for Whirlwinds. I presume they mean the fighter and not the license-built Sikorski helicopter of the same name (Everyone does it, Hawker built at least two “Fury”s and Lockheed made any number of “Electra”s.)

Short form: Like any and all RAF day fighters in the WWII era, Whirlwinds were originally camouflaged with Dark Earth and Dark Green upper surfaces. Sky (aka “Sky type S” which just means Smooth, ie finely ground pigment) was used on the underside, Propellers black with yellow tips, spinners black. Landing gear and landing gear wells Aluminum paint, not bare metal. Cockpit “British Interior Gray Green”- a hydraulic-fluid and fuel-proof paint with a semi-gloss finish.

In mid 1941, a Sky band 18″ wide was painted around the aft fuselage, just ahead of the fin and rudder. This is conveniently 1/4 inch, exactly, in 1/72 scale, and 3/8″ in 1/48. In metric that’s 25.4/4 or 6.35mm in 1/72, 76.2/8 or 9.53mm in 1/48. Prop spinners were also painted Sky at this time.

In late 1941, the Dark Earth color was replaced with Ocean Gray, which was both an official color and the name for a locally-prepared “Mixed Gray” consisting of 7 parts Sea Gray, Medium and 1 part Night (ie black). The underside became Sea Gray, Medium, but the ring around the aft fuselage and the spinners remained Sky. For added recognition help at short range, the leading edge of the wings (viewed from in front) got a yellow stripe, 2 or 3 inches wide at the wing tip, 5 or 6 (in the case of the Whirlwind) where the leading edge blended into the engine nacelles. Propellers remained black, landing gear Alumiunum and so forth. Only the outside colors changed.

There’s a raft of additional history of what color the squadron and aircraft codes (DW K, etc) were to be- a Gray, then Sky, then… and the wing and fuselage roundels AND fin-flash changed size and relative color areas.

THEREFORE, among the Tamiya AS spray paints, you can find an RAF Dark Earth, Dark Green, Ocean Gray, Sea Gray, Medium, and Sky. I know they make a Sky in their alcohol/water based brushing paint, I’ve got a bottle of it, but I tend to use the Polly Scale product because I find it easier. Not sure if any of their green, brown or grays are direct matches.

For British Interior Gray Green, Tamiya offer the following formula:

XF-5 Flat Green: 1 part, XF-21 Sky: 3 parts, XF-65 FIeld Gray: 1 part.

That looks plausable, I’ll have to mix some and see some day.

For the Landing Gear, inside of the gear doors and wells, you could use Tamiya XF-** Flat Aluminum. I would not recomend their XS-** Bare Metal spray paint, as the real thing was Aluminum Paint, not bare aluminum. This would NOT be an easy job with a brush and here’s where I’d strongly recomend using Polly Scale (metalics are still available in their Railroad line) or Model Master Acryl II (the stuff you can buy now). Maybe the Flat Aluminum bottled paint sprays easier than it brushes- probably so. Maybe they have a Flat Aluminum spray paint.

Semi-gloss black XF-** for propellers and tires, your choice of rusty brownish-blackish-metalic (custom mixed) for the exhaust covers.

If you’re building a Whirlwind with the green and grays Day Fighter Scheme, you could use XF-** Flat Yellow for the wing leading edges, outboard of the engine nacelles.

I hope this helps. I should make a TIME LINE of all the permutations of the Temperate Land scheme, the Day Fighter scheme, under side colors (only with the Day Fighter Scheme did upper and lower colors change together), along with roundel geometry, size and color (“indian” (subcontinent), sometimes called “brick” or “dull” red replaced the pre-war bright red.) call letters, prop spinners and interiors. All of the exterior and interior finish orders are essentially orthagonal to the aircraft- all day fighters, night fighters, day bombers, night bombers, night intruders, ocean patrol, carrier based, reconnisance, transport, trainers, prototype, etc, aircraft were to be finished to a common standard.

The LIKELY color of a given airplane, at a given squadron, in a given place, and with a given role, therefore depends on the date you’re interested in, possibly when the airplane was issued to the squadron and/or when the airplane was built or recived factory paint (major repairs for example) It never hurts to have a photo, black and white if it must be, of the precise airplane you are attempting to duplicate in miniature.

If you aren’t after a particular airplane, just want a particular scheme, go ahead, and if you are a bit, er, retentive, you can pick a real-life airplane that probably (or provable) had those colors. Or paint the airplane you want in the colors you want and enjoy it. This is a hobby. If you’re not having fun, you’re doing it wrong.

The prototype Whirlwind was dark gray, the second was Aluminum painted. One that came back to the factory for repair was stripped of weapons, painted RAF PRU Blue and flown as a utility hack by Westland, with a civil registration, from the end of the war until the later 1940s, when it was the last example to be scrapped. None survive today.

Footnotes:

Late war RAF fighters were built with the cockpit painted black above the pilot’s lap or so, interior gray-green below that. But the Whirlwinds were not in active service by then.

For airplanes with Sky undersurfaces, in late 1940-early 1941 period, one wing or one half the airplane underside including wing, horizontal stabalizer, etc, was painted black for recognition. This black half was an on and off thing with the RAF, in 1939-40 they had 1 black and 1 white wing and the rest aluminum paint (not bare metal), sometimes done as half black and half white down the middle, then Sky in place of the black and white, then Sky, then Sky with one wing black, then Sky without the black, and finally Sea Gray, Medium (aka Medium Sea Gray)

All this color changing was by order across all aircraft types, not just fighters, not just a particular fighter, and in some cases, was to be completed by dawn on a particular day, in other cases as time was available. In all cases, factory finishes, repair-and-storage-depot finishes and squadron-personel-applied finishes were done by people with differing facilities, materials, imperitives and experience. Though the orders were uniform, the results were not! For example, the MIxed Gray (a post-war name coined by enthusiasts, never used officially) and the officially issued Ocean Gray are not the same color- Mixed gray looking more purple to me.

Moreover, the relative pigment density of the Sea Gray, Medium and Night (black) used to make Mixed Gray would obviously affect the result- not only how much the finish was stirred before being applied, but how much the two ingredients were stirred before being mixed would affect the result. So I can mix my Sea Gray, Medium Polly Scale paint with Black Polly Scale paint, but I’d be a rash man indeed to claim the result is precicsely what someone mixing RAF-issued dope or lacquer in 1941 would have produced. A 7:1 ratio of finishing material, by volume, says nothing about the relative amounts of pigment!

Also, the official order, couched in officialese, was subject to mis-understanding. Cases are reported where the Mixed Gray was made from 7 parts Sky, one part Night ( wow :^P I have to try that some time ) or 7 parts White and one part Night… clearly that would be a much lighter result.

Not to mention that the RAF (like all airplane painters) applied enamel paint, lacquer or nitrate dope, depending on the underlying material (enamel on wood, steel, lacquer on aluminum, dope on fabric). Even if they looked them same when dry, they’d weather differently.

Categories: Uncategorized

How did your Representitive vote, and how do you feel about it?

October 1, 2008 · 1 Comment

My Congressional Representitive is the Honorable Barbara Lee and she voted against the bailout yesterday- no jobs programs, she told the newspapers, and on her web site, she listed 3 other points, it had to have a foreclosure moraturium, no rewarding bad behavior and no bailout without getting back the ill-gotten gains. Nice talk, but not enough to let it ride. Not enough to vote with Darrell Issa, and John Dolittle, Dana Rohrahacher, Duncan Hunter and the rest. When in doubt, look at who else opposes, and who else supports, a bill. She’s the new leader of the Congressional Black Caucus and it might have felt good to vote, “No”,  I think it was the wrong call.

Sometimes I’m willing to say Ms Lee’s exhibiting leadership when we disagree, but not this time. I wrote her an email and told her that her reasons weren’t, good enough. The lack of money and the dispair in my city, Oakland, is palpable, and we can talk improvements later, the house is on fire now and its time to do something about it. I’m whistling into the wind I’m sure…

I have a lot of hope for a better plan and little faith it’ll be produced. I understand why Pelosi doesn’t go for a party-line vote. On the other hand, what do you say to people who won’t vote for a package unless it contains capital gains tax rate cuts. Talking economics with the Republican Right is like talking economics with Communists. All theory, no practice, and the stupider it sounds the more they seem to like it. No room for reality, and no actual interest in it. Phoey.
Here’s the list of Californa Democrats and Republicans who voted against yesterday’s bailout plan:

(SD = San Diego area, LA = Los Angeles/Orange County/San Fernando metroplex, SF = San Francisco area)

Bob Fuller – D SD
Joe Baca – D Inland Empire
Loretta Sanchez – D LA
Linda Sanchez – D LA
Grace Naolitinato – D LA
Lucille Roybal-Allard – D LA
Diane Watson – D LA
Hilda Solis – D LA
Xavier Beccera (sp?) D LA
Andy Schiff – D LA
Brad Sherman – D LA
Fortney Stark – D SF
Barbara Lee – D Oakland/Berkeley
Lynn Woolsey – D Marin
C. Michael Thompson – D North Coast

John Dolittle – R North Central Valley
Devin Numes – R Central Valley
Kevin McCarthy – R Central Valley/North Coast
Elton Gallegly – R Santa Barbara
Edward Royce – R LA
Dana Rohrabacher – R LA
Darrell Issa – R So. Cal.
Brian Bilbay – R SD
Duncan Hunter – R SD

If your Congressional Representitive isn’t listed above, they voted FOR the bailout. For example, Mike Honda or Jackie Spier. If your Representitive IS listed above and you haven’t shared your thoughts with them, now might be a good time.

Total vote from our state was 29 YES, 24 NO, with the Democrats splitting 19/15 and the Republicans 10/9. So, among our Representitives, the bill would have passed and passed with a majority of both parties. Maybe we’re not as crazy out here as some would have it. We can hold our noses and do what’s needed when the chips are down.

I do NOT believe time is on our side and I do NOT believe whatever follows will be measurably better. Just like when Bush invaded Iraq, I think this is a disaster, but I sure hope I’m wrong.

Bill

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

de Havilland Mosquito Cockpit Colors: Questions!

September 5, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Hi friends,

I have always thought Mosquitos were Pretty Darn Cool. I’m also an avid model builder and emeshed in the coils of a typical “Advanced Modeler’s Syndrome” (AMS) situation- I’m attempting to build a reasonably accurate 1/48 B/PR Mk IV (series II) from the old Monogram kit. (hahahaha! Yes, I now have the Tamiya B/PR Mk IV… its a long story.)

I’m hoping to build DZ411 in its BOAC markings.

Putting the kit parts up against templates from scale plans revealed the following problems, all no doubt known but I’ll enumerate them anyway:

* Fin and Rudder about 1/4″ (6mm) too tall. (Either Modeller’s Datafile or AeroDetail give a correcton drawing…)
* Horizontal Stabilizers not wide (span) enough.
* Fuselage is too square in cross-section
* Fuselage is .140″ or about 3.5mm too NARROW, though wing tips are the right distance apart.
* Cockpit, bomb bay, nose compartment completely inaccurate.
* Main and tail wheel wells are completely empty except for gear legs
* Main gear legs rake too far forward.

So far I’ve

> widened the fuselage 0.040 by inserting a strip of styrene between the two halves
> started to approximate a cockpit using styrene stock, the True Details Mk II/Mk IV resin set, and 3 parts from the kit, the two fuselage halves and the bomber control yoke!
> inserted bulkheads fore and aft of the main gear door cutout
> Added wing ribs, underside skin and spars in one main gear well
> made a couple of trivial oil tanks for the gear wells
> sawn off the rudder and fin (oops- I can now see it can be trimmed as it sits)
> Figured out how to stretch the horizontal stabilizers: cut the top and bottom halves but not at the same spot, so one side overlaps the cut on the other side. Insert styrene stock to fill.
> schemed how to scab 0.05″ on the outside of each fuselage half if I decide to, while preserving the original wing root location. (Have to cut through extra for the wing… ugly…
> Considering improving the main gear legs
> Ignoring that the nacelles may be too close to the fuselage and thus props too small (should be 12 feet 0 inches, 3 inches in 1/48 scale)- I haven’t measured them or the spacing yet!
> bought two sets of resin exhausts (5 on a side) to use to fake-up the 6-on-a-side on the outside setup my reference pictures show
> Got the BOAC markings for an FB VI, mostly corrrect for the B/PR Mk IV.
> schemed how to widen the nose and canopy clear parts and either use them as is or vac-form replacements over them…
> started drawing the plans I can’t find for the cockpit and wheel wells.

And that brings us to the questions I’m hoping someone has answers for:

Fire Extinguisher Color:
I count 3 fire extinguishers- one clipped between access holes on the front of the rudder pedal box, one clipped near the floor at the Observer’s feet, one clipped to the Port cbabin wall for the pilot to use. What * C O L O R * would 1941-1945 RAF cockpit extinguishers be? The rare, old, item in a surviving airframe is a brownish dull red- is that weathering or correct?

Emergency Oxygen tank Color:
The box/rack visible from the front on the starboard side of the nose contains emergency ogygen. The main tanks in the fuselage are black. What * C O L O U R * are the emergency O2 bottles, 1941-1945?

Emergency Oxygen bottles appear to have a pressure gauge and valve. Colors? Appearance? Any detailed photos somewhere?

Regular oxygen flows from six tanks in the aft fuselage through valves at each crew station and into “Economizer, Oxygen Mk II”s. Are there two of these, one for each, or 3, one for each seat and one for the nose? – Ah, got this one. I can see from all my photo references that there are two and only two Economizers in a Mosquito cockpit. One for the Pilot, one for te Observer. I suppose the BOAC birds carried an extra one for the passenger. What an Economizer, Oxygen, is is a boxed version of the little plastic sack between the source hose and the mask on your emergency oxygen masks on airliners- the Economizer is a place where oxygen can gather while you are not inhaling- there’s bnon-return valve that closes when you’re not inhaling, and the old oxygen systems such as the one in the Mosquito weren’t actually demand systems- you set the knob for a given flow rate. Without the economizer, what you didn’t breathe in would simply dump into the cockpit, hence the name “economizer”.

Anyway,  I’ll post these answers on the Mosquto forum tomorrow.

What colour are the hoses which carry O2 treated breathing air?

The floor-boards between the pilot’s seat and the rudder pedals look smooth and redish-brown- phenolic board? A wood product? Have I got that color right?

The throttle has two levers outboard, on the far left, which have round, black, knobs. There are two levers inboard, on the far right of the throtle quadrant which have square, often orange yellow handles. The quadrant itself seems black, with bare aluminum trim and placards, and a red button on the inside (toward the pilot) at the back end.
Are those colors correct for 1941-1945? Is the yellow-orange for real?

In the aft part of the engine nacelle, the rear spar cuts diagonally across the bay containing the main gear when retracted. Are the two radius rods that anchor the gear to the rear spar the same length, or do they stagger to match the slant of the spar?

Along the aft bulkhead, does the aft bulkhead come dowm verticallly, parallel to the sides of the opening for the wheels?

I have more questions, but this is a good start.

Can anyone help?

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,